Member-supported news for Southern California
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Available On Air Stations
Support for LAist comes from:

Supreme Court says EPA's power plant regulations go too far

Ways to Subscribe
EPA Proposes New Limits On Emissions From Coal-Fired Plants
Jeff Swensen/Getty Images
Supreme Court has ruled against EPA's tough anti-pollution regulations of coal-powered power plants.

In a new ruling, the Supreme Court sided with major power companies and 20 states blocking tough EPA rules on power plant emissions.

In recent years, the Environmental Protection Agency has imposed strict anti-pollution rules on the nation's coal powered utility plants, limiting the amount of mercury and other toxic emissions allowed. These were challenged by 20 states and major power companies in the courts.

The Supreme Court has now sided with the challengers, ruling that the cost of adapting to these regulations should be taken into account.

Ethan Zindler, an analyst from Bloomberg New Energy Finance, told Take Two that most of the country's power plants had already complied with the regulations but the few that haven't will now be rethinking their plans going forward.



"While the deadline to reduce mercury levels has been in place for decades, some companies haven't already put them in place, and the implication is interesting for those who haven't already complied.  Some of the old coal plants are having trouble competing with natural gas (which has half the amount of emission that coal plants have)."

The Obama administration has followed a strong environmental agenda, and the new ruling means new proposed regulations will have to be re-examined.

Click on the blue player above to hear the entire story.

Stay Connected