Member-supported news for Southern California
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Available On Air Stations
Support for LAist comes from:

Countries around the world are developing national strategies for AI – is it time for a US strategy, and what would that look like?

FAIRFORD, ENGLAND - JULY 11:  A general Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc SkyGuardian remotely piloted aircraft that has arrived at RAF Fairford after completing the first transatlantic flight for such an aircraft is pictured, on July 11, 2018 in Gloucestershire, England. The 38ft long unmanned drone that has a 79ft wingspan, which took off from its base in North Dakota last night, will be on display at the Royal International Air Tattoo (RIAT) this weekend. Remotely piloted aircraft are increasingly important for both civilian and military applications, including the RAF, who are due to bring into service a variant of the SkyGuardian, which it is hoped will improve its long-range surveillance and precision strike capabilities.  (Photo by Matt Cardy/Getty Images)
Matt Cardy/Getty Images
A general Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc SkyGuardian remotely piloted aircraft that has arrived at RAF Fairford after completing the first transatlantic flight for such an aircraft is pictured, on July 11, 2018 in Gloucestershire, England.

The United States has been a world leader in researching, developing and deploying cutting edge technologies for decades, but across the country, little is being done to advance America’s national strategy when it comes to A.I.

The United States has been a world leader in researching, developing and deploying cutting edge technologies for decades.

Artificial intelligence is no different, with companies like Google, Intel and others leading the way in Silicon Valley. But across the country, little is being done to advance America’s national strategy when it comes to A.I., and that has the attention of at least one defense official in the Trump administration.

The New York Times recently reported on a memo that Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis sent to President Trump in May urging him to look into developing a national strategy for A.I. To not do so, he argued, would continue to put the U.S. at a disadvantage compared to countries like China, one of America’s main technological rivals and a country that has been open about its military working with commercial and academic institutions.

What would a U.S. national strategy on A.I. realistically look like?What factors would be most important to keep in mind when developing one? And how involved should Silicon Valley be in helping create this policy? What kind of ethical concerns should we consider when it comes to allowing machines to make decisions that a human would normally make, like whether to drop a bomb or fire a missile?

AirTalk invited the Pentagon’s Joint Artificial Intelligence Center to participate in our discussion but they declined our interview request.

Guests:

Will Knight, senior editor for artificial intelligence at the MIT Technology Review; he tweets

Oren Etzioni, chief executive officer of the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence, a Seattle-based research institute conducting high-impact research and engineering in the field of A.I. and professor of computer science at the University of Washington; he tweets

Elsa B. Kania, adjunct fellow at the Center for A New American Security; she tweets

Stay Connected