Member-supported news for Southern California
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Available On Air Stations
Support for KPCC comes from:

Should temporary restraining orders trigger gun surrenders across the country?

SPRINGVILLE, UT - JUNE 17:  Courtney Manwaring, (L) shows an AR-15 semi-automatic gun to David Barker (R) at Action Target on June 17, 2016 in Springville, Utah. Semi-automatics are in the news again after the nightclub shooting in Orlando F;lord last week. (Photo by George Frey/Getty Images)
George Frey/Getty Images
Courtney Manwaring, (L) shows an AR-15 semi-automatic gun to David Barker (R) at Action Target in Springville, Utah.

A SCOTUS ruling yesterday reaffirmed a ban on gun possession by convicted domestic abusers, but some prosecutors want the law to go further.

A Supreme court ruling yesterday reaffirmed a ban on gun possession by convicted domestic abusers, but some prosecutors want the law to go further in addressing the widespread, deadly correlation between domestic violence and gun violence.

In particular, Prosecutors Against Gun Violence want temporary restraining orders to trigger the surrender of personal firearms by the accused. Sixteen states, including California, follow that rule, but the prosecutors want a federal law consistent across the country.

Critics say such a law would violate the due process rights of alleged abusers.

Guests:

Mike McLively, Staff Attorney, Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence; he tweets from 

Josh Blackman, an associate professor of Law at the South Texas College of Law who specializes in constitutional law. He is the author of “Unprecedented: The Constitutional Challenge to Obamacare” (Public Affairs, 2013)

Stay Connected